Netanyahu’s controversial visit divides US lawmakers

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s upcoming visit to a joint session of the American Congress is rife with controversy. Critics label Israel’s military activities as “genocidal,” creating discomfort among U.S. lawmakers. Some claim the visit sets a worrying precedent, undermining the President’s role in steering foreign policy. However, Netanyahu’s supporters appreciate the chance to bolster US-Israeli diplomatic ties, given their strategic importance in a volatile Middle Eastern geopolitical landscape. Activist Cynthia Nixon has criticized Democratic Majority Leader Sen. Schumer for inviting Netanyahu, labeling it “disgraceful” in light of international outrage over Israel’s military actions. Nixon warned of potential legal consequences for Netanyahu and expressed shock at Schumer’s decision, which she felt contradicts the principles of human rights and democracy that Democrats espouse. The bipartisan invitation extended to Netanyahu, endorsed by key political figures, has ignited considerable public backlash.

US lawmakers polarized over Netanyahu’s visit

Human rights organization IfNotNow accused these politicians of backing Netanyahu despite Israel’s Gaza offensive. The politicians defended their decision by emphasizing the importance of maintaining strong ties with Israel. Critics question the wisdom of inviting Netanyahu amid an ongoing offensive in Gaza, sparking a fiery debate on U.S. foreign policy, the role of Congress and the U.S.-Israel relationship. Moreover, independent senator Bernie Sanders strongly criticized the planned visit and condemned Netanyahu’s government for their actions in Gaza that led to a major humanitarian crisis. He even threatened to boycott the visit. Political analyst Chris Hayes observed that the controversy has reached beyond left-leaning Democrats to the more moderately minded pro-Israel Democrats. He suggests that the act of welcoming Netanyahu has sparked widespread discourse within the party, escalating the internal conflict to a level that demands public attention.