The 401k Tax Myth That’s Costing You Thousands

I’ve been in the financial industry long enough to hear the same advice repeated over and over: “Max out your 401 (k) and IRA to save on taxes!” But after years of analyzing retirement strategies, I’ve discovered this might be the most expensive myth in personal finance today. Here’s the truth that most financial advisors won’t tell you: 401 (k) s and IRAs don’t save you money on taxes — they simply delay your tax bill until later. And with tax rates likely rising in the future, you could end up paying significantly more than if you had just paid your taxes upfront.

The Government Is Banking On Your Tax Deferral

When you contribute to a 401 (k) or traditional IRA, you’re not getting a tax reduction – you’re getting an income deferral. The government is essentially saying, “We won’t tax this income today, but we will tax it in the future.” They’re betting that they’ll collect more from you later. Think about it: the government created these vehicles. Do you really believe they designed a system that loses money? Of course not. They’re playing the long game, and most Americans are falling for it. Here’s why tax deferral is likely to cost you more:

• You’ll have fewer tax deductions in retirement (no mortgage interest, no dependent children)
• Historical tax rates suggest we’re currently in a period of unusually low taxation
• The growing national debt and interest payments will likely force tax increases
• Inflation will require you to withdraw more money, potentially pushing you into higher brackets
• Retirement account withdrawals are taxed at ordinary income rates (the highest tax bracket)

Looking at tax history since 1913, we’ve seen rates as high as 70-90% during specific periods. While I’m not suggesting we’ll return to those extreme levels, it’s clear that our current tax environment is historically favorable. With government spending out of control and interest on national debt mounting, higher future tax rates seem inevitable.

Business Owners Get Zero Tax Benefits

If you’re a business owner using a Solo 401 (k) or SEP IRA for tax benefits, I have news for you – you’re getting absolutely no advantage. You’re literally paying your own match and then paying taxes on that match later. You’re just kicking the can down the road. Business owners already have numerous tax advantages through business deductions. Why would you voluntarily defer income to a time when you’ll have fewer deductions and potentially higher tax rates? It makes no financial sense. Even at a recent real estate conference in Dallas, I met millionaire investors who were still being advised to max out their retirement accounts. These successful people are following advice that could cost them millions in unnecessary future taxes.

You Don’t Even Own Your 401 (k)

Here’s something most people don’t realize: you don’t actually own your 401 (k). You’re simply named as a beneficiary. The U.S. government owns it. This is why 401 (k) s have liability protection from lawsuits – because they’re not technically your property. This government ownership also means they can change the rules at any time. They can push back withdrawal ages, increase penalties, or create new taxes on distributions. You have no say in these changes. We’ve already seen this happen with Required Minimum Distributions, which were pushed from age 70½ to 72. What will they change next?

Better Alternatives Exist

If traditional retirement accounts are so problematic, what’s the alternative? While Roth IRAs offer some benefits (tax-free growth and withdrawals), they still have severe limitations:

• Income limits prevent high earners from contributing directly
• Annual contribution limits are too low ($7,000 in 2024) to build significant wealth
• The government can still change rules and potentially tax distributions in the future

This is why I’ve personally moved toward cash-flowing assets, such as real estate and properly structured whole life insurance. These vehicles provide actual tax benefits now, give me control over my money, and aren’t subject to the whims of changing government regulations. With real estate, I can claim depreciation, mortgage interest deductions, and utilize strategies like 1031 exchanges to defer capital gains. With properly structured whole life insurance, I can access my money tax-free while maintaining growth. The only time retirement accounts might make sense is when your employer is contributing money for you. Even then, I’d consider taking that money out as soon as practical to deploy in better vehicles. Don’t plan your financial future around the hope that tax rates will magically decrease or that you’ll be content living on less in retirement. Take control of your financial destiny now by questioning the conventional wisdom that’s been drilled into us for decades.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: But what about the company match in my 401 (k)? Isn’t that free money?

The company match can be valuable, but it’s not a reason to keep your money locked up for decades. Consider contributing enough to get the match, but be strategic about when and how you access those funds. Remember that even matched funds will be taxed as ordinary income when withdrawn, and the underlying investments often underperform compared to other options.

Q: Are Roth IRAs a better option than traditional retirement accounts?

Roth accounts are generally preferable to traditional tax-deferred accounts because withdrawals can be tax-free. However, they still have significant limitations, including low contribution limits, income restrictions, and government control. While better than traditional accounts, they’re not the optimal solution for building substantial wealth.

Q: What should I do with my existing 401 (k) or IRA?

This depends on your specific situation, but consider options such as self-directing your IRA into alternative investments, rolling funds into more flexible vehicles, or strategically withdrawing funds to reinvest in cash-generating assets. The key is understanding that leaving money in tax-deferred accounts until traditional retirement age may result in higher lifetime tax payments.

Q: Won’t I need less income in retirement, putting me in a lower tax bracket?

This is a common assumption that rarely proves true. Most retirees I work with spend just as much, or even more, in retirement as they did during their working years. Healthcare costs increase, and most people want to enjoy their freedom rather than live on a restricted budget. Planning to live on less is essentially planning for failure. Instead, focus on building assets that generate passive income without triggering unnecessary tax consequences.